
Most technical SEO audits end as PDFs nobody actioned. We audit your site's crawlability, rendering, performance, and structured data — then fix the issues in the codebase, because the same team that finds the problem can write the code.
Who this is for: Marketing leads, founders, and product teams whose websites have solid content but unclear search performance — and who want the underlying technical problems fixed by engineers, not handed back to a developer queue.
Typical situations we are asked to help with:
We review Search Console, analytics, crawl data, and your deployment setup to understand how the site is built and how search engines see it.
A systematic review of crawling, indexing, rendering, performance, internal linking, canonicalisation, and structured data — each finding tied to evidence.
Findings ranked by impact, effort, and risk. You approve what we implement; we flag what only makes sense for your internal team.
We write and deploy the fixes — server-side rendering rules, metadata templates, redirects, schema markup, asset optimisation, and caching changes.
Re-crawl and re-measure after deployment. Where agreed, we set up monitoring so regressions are caught early.
We do not publish client traffic claims we cannot verify. Where case studies include search-related work, they describe methodology and implemented changes rather than guaranteed outcomes.
Every engagement defines its measurements upfront. We report what the data shows — not projected outcomes.
Tools like Screaming Frog or Ahrefs are part of our process, not the output. We interpret the data in the context of your specific stack — whether that is Next.js, WordPress, or something else — separate real issues from noise, and then implement the fixes. A tool cannot tell you why your canonical tags conflict with your prerendering rules; an engineer can.
No, and you should be cautious of anyone who does. Search rankings depend on many factors including competition, content quality, and Google's own changes. What we guarantee is a rigorous process: correct technical foundations, verified implementation, and honest reporting on what changed.
Yes. Many engagements involve auditing the site, delivering a prioritised fix list with code-level guidance, and supporting your developers through implementation. Others involve us implementing directly. Both work; we match the arrangement to your capacity.
A full audit makes sense annually, after major site migrations or redesigns, and whenever Search Console shows unusual indexing changes. Between audits, monitoring of key templates and vitals catches regressions early.
Technical SEO removes barriers — it lets good content be crawled, indexed, and understood correctly. It rarely substitutes for content quality, authority, and relevance. In practice the best results come from solid technical foundations plus a content strategy aimed at what your buyers actually search for.
We implement structured data that accurately describes the visible content of your pages — Organization, Breadcrumb, Article, Product, FAQ, and similar types where appropriate. Rich result appearance is always at Google's discretion; we never mark up content that is not on the page.
Tell us about your situation and we will respond within one business day with an honest view of whether — and how — we can help.
Get in Touch